From: Ashu M. G. Solo [mailto:amgsolo@mavericktechnologies.us]
Sent: Friday, October 04, 2013 11:37 PM
Subject: MEDIA ALERT: Solo's Christmas Message Case Isn't Over Yet
Sent: Friday, October 04, 2013 11:37 PM
Subject: MEDIA ALERT: Solo's Christmas Message Case Isn't Over Yet
As I said at http://ckom.com/story/provinces-human-rights-commission-rejects-merry-christmas-complaint/136401,
my case about Christmas messages on Saskatoon Transit buses isn’t over
yet. I’m going to take this case to the
Court of Queen’s Bench when time permits.
You haven’t heard the last of this case.
The Saskatchewan Human Rights
Commission decides whether to pursue cases based only on the Saskatchewan Human
Rights Code. At the Court of Queen’s Bench, I can make arguments based on
the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms. The guarantees of religious
equality and multiculturalism in the Charter will give me a much stronger case
than I had with the human rights code. Therefore, the Court of Queen’s
Bench is a much better avenue than the Saskatchewan Human Rights Commission for
me to argue this case. There was no harm in trying the Saskatchewan Human
Rights Commission first, particularly because its process is simpler and
involves no cost to the complainant and they provide legal representation.
It's my
position that freedom of conscience in section 2a of the Canadian Charter of
Rights and Freedoms includes freedom from religion, that section 15 of the
Charter guarantees religious equality, that the Charter forbids attempts to
coerce, limit, or otherwise influence the choice of religious observance, and
that section 27 of the Charter on multiculturalism forbids conferring special
privileges or benefits on any particular religion. It's my position that
a Christmas message on Saskatoon Transit buses violates these sections of the Canadian
Charter of Rights and Freedoms.
I think the Saskatchewan Human
Rights Commission made its decision based on the public backlash, not the
Saskatchewan Human Rights Code. I think the Saskatchewan Human Rights
Commission chickened out of pursuing this complaint because it was highly
controversial and they were afraid of the public backlash against the existence
of the human rights commission. But as Sylvester Stallone said in Rocky
Balboa, “Ain’t nothing over till it’s over.”
At the Court of Queen’s Bench, I
will seek a judgment that has the effect of banning religious messages by the
state throughout the province of Saskatchewan and that has significant
persuasive value in other provinces.
My opponents shouldn’t be gloating
because I’m just getting started in fighting for secularism. You ain’t
seen nothing yet. I don’t care about media coverage like some people
think. I care about the advancement of freedom like every person should.
Best regards,
Ashu M. G. Solo